The truth is, most mobile apps don’t make it past the first few months.
Maybe it misses the mark. Maybe it’s overbuilt and underused. Or maybe it just never gets into users’ hands quickly enough to learn anything meaningful.
It’s not about cutting corners – it’s about focusing on what matters most, launching faster, and learning from real users before pouring time and money into full development.
Here, we’ll break down what an MVP really is, how to build one that delivers actual value, and why some of the world’s most successful apps all started with less than you’d think.
Let’s dive in!
Table of Contents
What is a minimum viable product (MVP)?
A minimum viable product, or MVP, is a bare-bones version of your app that contains only the essential features needed to solve your users’ core problem.
The primary goal of an MVP isn’t to create a polished final product but to test the viability of your app idea with real users as quickly and cost-effectively as possible.
An MVP lets you validate your assumptions, gather user feedback, and iterate on your product without committing to full-scale development.
100+ projects delivered. We’re ready for yours. Let’s talk →
These numbers show the importance of validating your app concept before investing significant resources.
An MVP serves as your testing ground to answer one critical question: will my app idea make it in the real world?
Because while there’s no shortage of app ideas, only a handful are truly viable.
By launching an MVP, you get to see how people actually interact with your product, spot where they struggle, and figure out if your solution clicks with your target audience.
This gives you solid proof of product-market fit instead of just leaning on guesswork or theoretical market studies.
Key characteristics of successful MVPs
A successful MVP isn’t just a stripped-down product – it’s a focused version of your idea that’s good enough to be used, tested, and improved.
It’s not a prototype. It’s not a beta with every feature baked in.
It’s something real users can try, that tells you if your idea is actually worth building or not.
Here’s what the best MVPs have in common:
A clear core feature – Focus on a single function that proves your idea works. Spotify started with just basic desktop streaming and that was enough.
Real user value – Even a scrappy MVP should solve a real problem. Instacart delivered groceries manually, but it worked.
Cost-effective development – An MVP should require minimal time and resources to build. The goal is to learn fast without burning through your budget.
Room to grow – Your MVP should be a starting point, not a dead end. Think of it as the foundation for the full product, something you can build on as user feedback rolls in and priorities shift.
If your MVP checks these boxes, you’re setting yourself up to for success down the road.
A well-executed MVP gives you real-world feedback, reveals what actually matters to your users, and helps you avoid wasting time on features no one cares about.
It’s your best shot at turning a good idea into a product people genuinely want.
Why build an MVP for your mobile app?
Here, we’ll take a closer look at why you should build an MVP for your mobile app.
Market validation and risk reduction
The primary benefit of MVP development is testing your app idea against real-world market demand.
As Eric Ries, who popularized the MVP concept, put it:
“We must learn what customers really want, not what they say they want or what we think they should want.”
This gets at something crucial – there’s often a huge gap between what market research suggests and how people actually behave when using a product.
And if you build based on assumptions rather than evidence, you’ll waste money and time on a product nobody actually wants.
When you validate through an MVP, you’re creating a bare-bones version of your product with just enough features to attract early adopters and get meaningful feedback.
Take Dropbox – instead of immediately building their entire cloud storage system, they simply released a video showing how their concept would work:
This alone generated thousands of waiting list sign-ups, proving market interest before they’d actually written a single line of code.
Even massive funding can’t save you if you haven’t properly checked whether users actually want what you’re building.
And if your MVP shows that market demand just isn’t there, you’ve saved a ton of time and money by finding out early.
User feedback and iterative improvement
The MVP approach gives you a solid framework to collect real user feedback and make data-driven improvements as you build your product.
Instead of guessing what users want, you make decisions based on actual user behavior.
By building a bare-bones version with just the essential features, you can test if their core idea really works before pouring tons of resources into a complete solution.
This flips the traditional development approach on its head by putting user needs first.
And it lets you figure out which features users actually care about and which ones they can skip.
This helps you use your limited resources where they’ll make the biggest difference. And creating a feedback loop is key to this.
You get two types of insights when tracking MVP performance: qualitative feedback that helps explain why users behave the way they do, and quantitative data that shows what they’re doing at scale.
Qualitative feedbackhelps you understand the context behind user behavior:
User interviews – Direct conversations that uncover user motivations, pain points, and expectations.
Usability testing – Helps you observe how users interact with your product to identify friction or confusion.
Support tickets – Highlight recurring issues or questions users face.
User reviews – Uncover sentiment and unmet needs in the users’ own words.
Meanwhile, quantitative metrics give you hard numbers about your MVPs performance.
Here are some metrics you can track:
Daily and monthly active users (DAU/MAU) – Show how many users consistently use your app.
Activation rate – Tracks the percentage of users who complete key actions, like signing up and creating a profile.
Feature usage – Reveals which features users rely on and which they ignore.
Retention rate – Measures how many users come back after their first visit.
Churn rate – Shows how many users are leaving and when they leave.
Session duration – Indicates how long users engage with your product in a single session.
Task completion rate – Shows how often users succeed in completing important flows, like placing an order or finishing onboarding.
NPS (Net Promoter Score) – Gives you an idea of overall user satisfaction and loyalty.
For example, a fitness app might discover that 80% of users consistently log workouts, but only 12% ever use the social sharing feature despite the team having spent weeks building it.
That’s a clear signal to rethink priorities.
This mix of feedback becomes your guide. When users are sticking around and engaging with core features, it means you’re on the right track.
But if churn is creeping up, or key features aren’t being used, those are warning signs you need to act on.
By constantly learning from this feedback and adjusting accordingly, you will build something that your users actually need.
Early bug detection and cost savings
No software launches completely bug-free.
Even tech giants like Google, Apple, and Microsoft release products with significant issues that need immediate fixes.
Success isn’t about getting everything perfect right away.
It’s about spotting and fixing problems quickly, listening to what users tell you, and having systems that let you deploy fixes quickly when things go wrong.
That’s the real key to making it work. And that’s why you shouldn’t neglect QA, even if you’re chasing a deadline.
Investing in good QA upfront will save you a lot of money. Bugs and defects are between 30x and 100x more expensive to fix post-deployment than right at the start:
This rapid spike in costs happens because post-launch fixes aren’t simple.
You’re dealing with complicated deployment processes, having to make things right with users who got burned, and potentially taking a hit to your reputation.
MVPs give you a huge edge by catching problems when they’re still cheap to solve.
Instead of building the whole product upfront, you launch with just the essentials and collect feedback from real users.
And that means you have the luxury of spotting bugs and fixing them at a lesser cost.
Types of mobile app MVPs
Next, we’ll cover the main types of mobile app MVPs.
Single-feature MVP
A single-feature MVP, like the name suggests, focuses exclusively on one core functionality.
This makes it the fastest to develop and easiest to explain to users.
This approach works best when you’re confident about your app’s primary value proposition.
Here’s a look at the pros and cons of this approach:
Uber’s 2010 MVP exemplifies this strategy perfectly.
Founders Travis Kalanick and Garrett Camp knew their unique selling proposition: allowing users to book rides from their smartphones.
Their MVP did exactly one thing – it connected users who entered their address with the nearest cab driver.
This hyper-focused approach allowed them to gather targeted feedback and iterate effectively, eventually building the comprehensive platform we know today.
Concierge MVP
A concierge MVP relies on human operators to provide services that would eventually be automated.
This approach allows you to test advanced features without developing complex backend systems from scratch.
Here’s a look at the pros and cons of concierge MVPs:
However, founder Nick Swinmurn manually photographed shoes from local stores, processed orders by physically purchasing items, and shipped them to customers.
This bootstrapped setup proved the online shoe store idea worked without needing any inventory systems or automated logistics in place.
Piecemeal MVP
A piecemeal MVP combines existing tools, services, and products to create a functional app without building everything from scratch.
This approach offers speed advantages and can be cost-effective depending on your tool selection.
Groupon’s MVP is a good example of a piecemeal MVP.
The site used basic WordPress for the frontend, FileMaker for deal management, and Apple Mail scripts for automated customer communications.
While cobbled together, this system provided more automation than manual approaches while validating the group-buying concept quickly and at low cost.
Step-by-step MVP app development process
Here, we’ll show you how to build your MVP, step-by-step.
Identify user problems and needs
You need to start by zeroing in on your target niche.
Not because it sounds fancy, but because it works. Instead of making an app for “everyone” (which usually means no one in particular), focus on a specific group or need.
Rather than building just another fitness app, you might create one specifically for busy professionals who need quick 20-minute workouts.
When you narrow your focus like this, you can build something that actually clicks with a particular audience.
Once you’ve picked your niche, get out there and talk to real people – aim for about 15-20 interviews to get meaningful insights.
Structure your conversations around questions that get people talking. Instead of asking “Do you use budgeting apps?” try something like “Walk me through how you keep track of your daily expenses.”
Record these chats (with permission, of course) to catch those little details you might miss when taking notes. You should dig into:
The current solutions they use to solve their problem
Recurring frustrations with existing products
Time and money they’re spending to deal with the problem
How often they run into a particular pain point
What their dream solution would look like
Create a consistent set of questions to use in all your interviews – this will help you spot patterns later.
Watch not just what people say, but how they say it. Sometimes their tone or body language tells you more about what really frustrates them than their words do.
After gathering all this feedback, roll up your sleeves , analyze it systematically, and look for patterns.
Are multiple users mentioning the same pain points? Do they get particularly animated when discussing certain problems? Are there consistent gaps in the products they’re currently using?
This mix of number-crunching and reading between the lines will help you clearly define the core problem your app needs to solve.
Yes, this validation process takes time, but it saves you from wasting resources building features nobody wants.
Remember, the most successful products aren’t just technically impressive – they solve real problems.
Define your target audience and market size
The next step is diving deeper into your research to build user personas across four areas: demographics, behaviors, psychographics, and geography.
Getting these details right helps you shape your MVP’s features and messaging in ways that actually connect with real users.
Here’s what you should define for each areas:
Demographics – Age, income, education, occupation, family status
Behaviors – Tech habits, device preferences, app usage frequency
Geography – Urban vs. rural, infrastructure access, regional norms
Let’s say you’re building a personal finance app.
Knowing your ideal users are 30-something professionals earning $75K+ helps shape features, design, and pricing that actually fit their lives.
Once you know who you’re targeting, figure out if the market is worth entering.
Use tools like Facebook Ads Manager or Google Ads Keyword Planner to estimate audience size based on interests and traits.
Then, go deeper:
Check out free summaries from Statista, IBISWorld, or Gartner to better understand market trends.
Lurk in Reddit threads, Facebook groups, or forums where your audience hangs out.
Listen for complaints, unmet needs, and language users use to describe their problems.
When calculating your market size, start with your total addressable market, then narrow to your serviceable available market (SAM), i.e. the segments you can realistically reach with your resources.
Then determine your serviceable obtainable market (SOM), the slice you can reasonably capture in your first few years.
This will give you much more realistic numbers than assuming you’ll capture the entire market.
Analyze competitors and market opportunities
Before you start building, you need to know what you’re up against.
A solid competitive analysis helps you understand where your app fits in and what it needs to do better.
Start by exploring the Apple App Store and Google Play in your category.
Look at top-ranked apps, trending ones, and those getting featured. Then, analyze the competition across 4 key areas:
Features – What core and standout features do they offer? Features that show up in every top app are likely baseline expectations. Unique features tell you how others are trying to stand out.
Revenue models – How do your competitors make money? Pay attention to freemium setups, subscriptions, in-app purchases, pricing tiers, and ads.
User experience – Download the apps and use them. Take note of onboarding flows, navigation, and visual design. What feels smooth? What’s frustrating?
Performance data – Use tools like Sensor Tower or Appfigures to dig into downloads, retention, engagement, and revenue estimates.
And don’t stop at app stores.
Platforms like Product Hunt, Kickstarter, and Indiegogo often feature early-stage ideas before they go mainstream. You’ll spot emerging trends and see what’s getting early traction.
Social platforms, Reddit threads, and niche forums are also goldmines for real user pain points that current apps haven’t solved yet.
This kind of research helps you in three big ways:
Finding gaps – Spot underserved users, missing features, or repeated complaints that no one’s addressed yet.
Prioritizing features – See which features actually drive engagement across similar apps and decide what’s critical for your MVP.
Positioning your product – Figure out how your app can stand out. Will it be better UX? Smarter pricing? A niche audience no one else is targeting?
This isn’t about copying the competition.
It’s about understanding what’s out there so you can build something sharper.
The best apps borrow what works, fix what doesn’t, and solve a real problem in a way no one else has quite nailed.
Define core features using prioritization frameworks
Prioritizing the right features is one of the most important steps when building your MVP.
It helps you move fast, avoid overbuilding, and focus your team on what actually matters.
One of the most popular methods for this is the MoSCoW framework, which breaks features down into four clear categories:
Must have – Core functionality your product can’t launch without. Without these, the app doesn’t solve the main problem.
Should have – Valuable features that improve the experience but aren’t critical for day one.
Could have – Extras that users might enjoy but won’t miss in the first version.
Won’t have – Ideas you’re deliberately cutting to avoid distraction or scope creep.
Let’s say you’re building a food delivery app.
Your “must haves” are things like restaurant listings, ordering, and payment. “Should haves” might be restaurant ratings or order tracking.
“Could haves” could include saved payment methods or advanced filters. And “won’t haves” would be features like a loyalty program or social sharing – good ideas, but not essential for validating the core product.
If MoSCoW doesn’t quite fit your team’s style, there are other frameworks that can help:
RICE – Scores features based on Reach, Impact, Confidence, and Effort. Great when you’re comparing lots of competing ideas.
Value vs. effort matrix – Helps you map quick wins versus long hauls, so you can make smarter tradeoffs.
Kano model – Separates basic expectations from exciting differentiators, so you don’t overinvest in features users assume should already be there.
Whatever framework you use, the important thing is staying focused.
Run regular prioritization sessions with your team so everyone’s on the same page about what actually needs to be built now and what can wait.
Let data guide your decisions wherever possible, whether it’s insights from user interviews, market research, or usage analytics.
And keep a visual representation of your feature priorities handy. It helps set expectations with stakeholders and shows you’re making decisions for a reason.
The more disciplined you are with feature selection, the more likely your MVP is to actually deliver value.
Create interactive prototypes
Building interactive prototypes is one of the smartest things you can do early in the app development process.
They let you test the flow and feel of your product without writing a single line of code.
Tools like Figma and Protopie make it easy to simulate real interactions, complete with transitions, animations, and logic that mimic the final product.
These clickable mockups turn abstract ideas into something tangible, so everyone on the team can actually see what you’re building.
A strong prototype usually includes:
Clickable buttons, links, and toggles that simulate real interactions
Realistic navigation across screens and features
Conditional flows that adapt to user input
Real copy where possible, not just lorem ipsum
Screen states for different scenarios like empty screens, errors, or confirmations
This stage is a game-changer for product development. You’ll catch usability issues early and test solutions quickly.
Maybe you realize users can’t find the checkout button in your e-commerce flow. No big deal, you just move it. Problem solved, long before developers get involved.
When you put prototypes in front of real users, the feedback you get is way more actionable.
People interact with them naturally, exposing pain points and usability gaps you’d never spot in a slide deck.
Say you’re prototyping a healthcare app. You might find that older users struggle with text size or gesture-based navigation. That’s the kind of insight static screens just can’t give you.
The time you spend here pays off later. It keeps dev costs down, reduces rework, and builds a stronger foundation for the product you actually want to launch.
Build your MVP with quality in mind
Even if your MVP only includes core features, quality still matters. A lot.
Users expect smooth experiences from day one and they won’t give you a pass just because it’s “early access.”
Remember, nearly a quarter of users abandon an app after first use. If your app crashes, lags, or confuses users, they’re gone before they ever see the value you worked so hard to build.
Your MVP is often someone’s first real interaction with your brand – and that first impression sticks.
Here’s how to move fast without shipping something sloppy:
Write clean, scalable code – Use naming conventions, keep your structure organized, and document just enough to avoid future headaches. Poor code might not break your MVP, but it’ll break your ability to grow it later.
Test the essentials – Test what matters. Focus on the core user flows, set up basic automation, and make sure nothing critical breaks.
Prioritize quality over quantity – A few features that work flawlessly are better than a bloated MVP full of half-baked ideas. Solve one real problem well before adding bells and whistles.
Add built-in feedback loops – Let users share insights directly through your app. You’ll catch usability issues early and shape your roadmap with real-world input.
For traditionally built MVPs, development timelines usually fall between 2-6 months.
That gives you space for proper planning, execution, and testing without skipping the fundamentals.
The goal of an MVP isn’t to rush something half-finished out the door.
It’s to build something small, focused, and reliable that teaches you what users actually want.
And when you maintain quality while keeping scope tight, you set your product up for long-term success.
Implement analytics tools and feedback systems
To make smart decisions post-launch, you need real data, not guesses.
Modern MVPs live or die by how well they capture user behavior and feedback. If you’re not learning from how people use your product, you’re just building in the dark.
The good news? You don’t need a huge data stack to get started.
A few well-chosen tools can give you everything you need to understand what’s working, what’s not, and what to do next. Here are some of the top tools you should be using_
Contentsquare – Great for visualizing user behavior. It gives you heatmaps, session replays, and journey insights that help pinpoint where users drop off or get stuck.
Usersnap – Ideal for gathering direct feedback. Users can annotate screenshots, submit micro-surveys, and send issues with full context.
Hotjar – A solid all-rounder for heatmaps, session recordings, and in-app surveys. Easy to set up with no-code or low-code MVPs, and great for spotting early UX friction.
Firebase Analytics – Built for mobile. It offers detailed event tracking and real-time insights, with native support for iOS, Android, and React Native.
Amplitude – Offers deeper behavior analysis with funnel tracking, cohort breakdowns, and retention insights. If you’re trying to understand long-term patterns, this is the go-to.
Microsoft Clarity – A solid free option for early-stage MVPs. You get unlimited session recordings, heatmaps, and AI-generated insights without hitting a paywall.
Setting up analytics from the start means you’re ready to iterate with real insight, not gut feeling.
You’ll see what features people actually use, where they drop off, and how they move through your app.
And when that feedback’s coming in through screenshots, surveys, or session recordings, it’s a lot easier to fix the right things, faster.
Put simply: the sooner you start tracking and listening, the sooner your MVP starts getting better.
Modern MVP development approaches
Next, we’ll cover some modern approaches to MVP development that could save you a lot of time and money.
AI-assisted coding
AI tools are changing how software gets built from the ground up.
Instead of writing every line of code manually, developers can now describe what they want in plain language and let AI do the heavy lifting.
Some call this “vibe coding” – you explain the intent, and the AI translates it into working code.
This sits somewhere between traditional development and no-code platforms. You move faster, but still maintain full control over your codebase.
Unlike most no-code tools, AI coding assistants (if you prompt them well and give them enough context) typically generate clean, modular code you can actually use.
And you’re not locked into a black box – you’re reviewing, refactoring, and building on AI-written code just like you would with a colleague’s pull request.
That changes the developer’s role. With less time spent on repetitive tasks, there’s more space to think about architecture, product logic, and user experience.
GitHub Copilot (41.9%) – The most widely used tool. It integrates directly into your IDE and helps with everything from code suggestions to full functions.
Gemini Code Assist(31.9%) – Google’s AI assistant, designed to work across multiple platforms and contexts, from mobile to cloud-native codebases.
Amazon Q (formerly CodeWhisperer)(28.4%) – Amazon’s developer-focused tool, strong in cloud-based projects and AWS-native workflows.
Cursor (28.4%) – Built specifically for AI pair programming, offering inline suggestions and deep file context awareness.
Augment (20.2%) – A growing tool that focuses on AI-assisted refactoring, testing, and documentation generation.
Just a note: general AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude weren’t included in the report – this list is just for dev-focused coding assistants. With them, the landscape is even more varied.
The key thing is that these tools aren’t just speeding up development. They’re also changing who can participate.
Non-technical founders and domain experts can now get involved earlier in the development process.
And that’s good news. Because the faster you can test your idea, the faster you can build something worth scaling.
No-code MVP development
No-code tools have opened the door for non-technical founders to build and ship their first version without having to write a single line of code.
They’re perfect when you need to move fast, keep costs low, and start collecting real user feedback.
You can build something in a week or two, test it with real users, and iterate before you’ve spent more than a few thousand dollars.
Here are some of the most useful no-code platforms for MVPs:
Adalo – Great for building mobile apps with drag-and-drop components. You can publish as Progressive Web Apps or native apps on iOS and Android.
Bubble – One of the most powerful visual app builders for the web. Supports dynamic logic, custom databases, and API integrations.
Glide – Ideal for building directories, marketplaces, or simple CRMs using a spreadsheet (Google Sheets or Airtable) as your backend.
Softr – A beginner-friendly platform built around Airtable. Great for quick MVPs that don’t need a custom UI or deep logic.
Backendless – Offers more backend control than most no-code platforms. A good choice if you want to learn how things work under the hood.
No-code platforms shine when you’re building early-stage web apps, simple marketplaces, or lightweight SaaS products with basic dashboards.
Simpler builds can be done by specialist agencies in 2–4 weeks, while more advanced ones with custom workflows or integrations can take longer and cost more.
That said, once your product gets more complex, you’ll probably outgrow no-code.
If your MVP needs advanced user permissions, real-time features, or deep integrations, you’ll want to switch to custom or hybrid development.
Low-code development
Low-code platforms give you a fast, flexible way to build MVPs, especially when your idea doesn’t need a ton of complex logic right out of the gate.
Like vibe coding, they sit somewhere between no-code tools and full custom development.
You get drag-and-drop UI builders, pre-built components, and basic automation all while keeping the option to write custom code when needed.
It’s not a magic bullet, but it works well when speed matters more than deep customization. Here’s how the main low-code platforms compare:
Microsoft Power Apps – Best for teams already in the Microsoft ecosystem. Easy to connect with Excel, Teams, and Azure.
Mendix – Focuses on cross-team collaboration. Ideal if your business and tech teams are building together.
OutSystems – Enterprise-focused. Strong on scalability, governance, and security for regulated industries.
Retool – Built for developers. Great for internal tools with reusable components and direct API/database connections.
If you’re building an internal tool, simple customer portal, or a proof-of-concept app, low-code can get you to market in 2–6 weeks, often for a fraction of the cost of custom builds.
But there are trade-offs. If your MVP needs advanced features, unique UX, or deep integrations, you’ll hit platform limits fast. That’s when full-code development is a better bet.
MVP cost breakdown: how much does it cost to build an MVP?
No-code MVPs are the most accessible financially, with platform subscriptions ranging from $25-100 monthly and agency-built solutions costing $1,000-$3,000.
Development timelines span days to weeks, making this approach ideal if you need to rapidly validate your idea.
Low-code development typically costs $1,000-$25,000 with a 2-6 week timeline and a solid middle ground between speed and customization.
Now, you could only make a really simple MVP for $15,000 and call it a day.
But, quality matters. A high-quality MVP for a simple app idea can easily cost over $40,000 to build. And for complex, enterprise-level apps just the MVP can cost over $250,000.
However, you get complete control and unlimited customization options.
That level of flexibility comes at a cost – but if your product relies on complex logic, unique functionality, or deep integrations, it might just be the only realistic path.
Custom MVPs give you full ownership over the tech and scalability from day one, which can be a huge advantage if you’re building something meant to last.
Just be sure you’re solving a real problem before you make that kind of investment.
Also, you need to factor in what it’ll cost you after launching – platform subscriptions, hosting, analytics tools, and salaries for team members working on improvements.
Make sure you set aside money for regular improvements, since successful MVPs need updates based on what users tell you and how the market shifts.
Real-world MVP success stories
Finally, we’ll cover some of the most well-known MVP success stories.
Facebook
Facebook launched as “TheFacebook” in 2004, offering basic profiles for Harvard students.
Within 24 hours, 1,200 students had signed up.
Six months later, the platform expanded to other top U.S. universities and hit 150,000 users.
By April 2005, it had 3.85 million users – enough to raise $12.2M from Accel Partners.
That funding helped scale their tech and team.
Over the next few years, Facebook introduced News Feed, opened to the public, and launched the Facebook Platform – transforming a college directory into a global social network.
Airbnb
In 2007, Airbnb started with three air mattresses on a living room floor during a sold-out design conference.
Guests paid $80 per night for a bed and breakfast, while the founders handled everything manually, from check-in to photography.
They launched with a simple site and processed payments through PayPal.
This approach helped them build real relationships with early users, many of whom became loyal advocates. And they did it without burning through capital.
Uber
Uber’s MVP was a stripped-down app for booking rides with nearby drivers.
It nailed a single promise: tap a button, get a ride. That simplicity made it easy to test, scale, and gather early user data.
After proving the model, Uber expanded with UberX (affordable rides), UberPOOL (carpooling), and Uber Eats (food delivery).
Now, it offers everything from public transit integrations to bike rentals and flight bookings – all built on the foundation of a focused MVP.
Mobile app MVP: FAQs
You don’t need a 40-page business plan, but you do need clarity.
That means understanding the problem you’re solving, who you’re solving it for, and whether there’s enough market demand to justify the effort.
The MVP itself is part of shaping your business model. It helps you validate your core assumptions, test early positioning, and figure out what people are actually willing to pay for (or not).
Think of it as the first real-world step in building your business, not something that comes after you’ve figured everything out.
You could, but it’s rarely a good idea.
Going straight to a full build means locking in features, making expensive technical decisions early, and potentially spending months building something users don’t want.
An MVP helps you avoid all that by testing the concept first.
If the MVP works, you’ll have real data to guide the next phase.
And if it doesn’t, you’ve saved time, money, and effort – and now you have feedback that can shape a better version.
You’re ready when your MVP checks three boxes: it solves one real problem, works reliably, and gives you a way to collect feedback from early users.
It doesn’t need every feature on your wishlist. It doesn’t need perfect design. But it does need to provide actual value and be stable enough that people can use it without getting frustrated.
If you’re still waiting to polish everything before launch, you’re probably overbuilding.
Launch small, learn fast, and improve based on what real users actually do – not what you think they might want.
Planning to build an MVP?
Are you planning to build an MVP but not sure where to start or how to make it count?
You’re not alone.
We’ve worked with startups and scaleups across industries to turn early-stage ideas into working products that actually solve real problems.
Whether you’re validating a new concept or refining an existing one, we’ll help you focus on what matters most.
And that’s cutting through the noise and building something people actually want to use.
If you’re ready to move from idea to MVP with less risk, let’s talk. We’ll walk you through the process and help you figure out what to build first.
Ante is a true expert. Another graduate from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, he’s been a DECODEr from the very beginning. Ante is an experienced software engineer with an admirably wide knowledge of tech. But his superpower lies in iOS development, having gained valuable experience on projects in the fintech and telco industries.
Ante is a man of many hobbies, but his top three are fishing, hunting, and again, fishing. He is also the state champ in curling, and represents Croatia on the national team. Impressive, right?
