Find the right AI use cases before investing in development.
Connect AI to your existing systems and workflows.
Build autonomous AI agents that automate complex tasks.
Design and develop AI solutions tailored to your business.
Build secure, scalable AI systems for enterprise environments.
Legacy software modernization →
Upgrade outdated systems for better performance, security, and scalability.
Make informed technology decisions before investing in development.
Validate your product idea with user and business insights.
Define the right scope to launch faster and reduce risk.
Confirm your idea is technically viable before you build.
Capabilities
Want to start a software project with us?
Book a time with our technology experts →
We brought young developers together to explore the future of AI agents. More editions are coming soon.
DE*updated September 2026
Ask ten CTOs what a software product costs to build and you’ll get ten different numbers, and every one of them will be right for their situation.
We’ve sat through enough scoping calls to know that “how much will this cost” is really three questions in one: how complex is the product, who’s building it, and how long will it need to live and grow after launch.
If you’re trying to put a number in front of a board or an investor before you’ve written a line of code, the vague answer is “it depends.” The useful answer is what really moves that number up or down, and where we’d tell a client to spend more, not less.
In this article, we’ll give you real 2026 cost ranges by product complexity, the nine factors that determine your final price, and practical ways to lower costs without cutting corners.
Let’s dive in!
Key takeaways
There’s no single number we can give you here, and we’d be lying if we pretended otherwise.
Every product has different requirements, and cost varies with each one of them.
What we can give you are typical ranges. Here’s how we break down software product costs in 2026:
And this doesn’t include other services like product discovery.
In short, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer on how much software product development will cost you.
Your total cost will depend on a lot of different factors – we’ll discuss the main ones in more detail and give you tips how to reduce them.
Now, let’s talk about the key factors that influence the cost of your software product’s development.
Complexity is still the single biggest driver of software product development costs, and it starts with platform choice.
The first thing that will determine your cost is your product’s platform:
It goes without saying that if you target more than one platform, it will cost you more.
But, even then, building a cross-platform mobile app will be much cheaper than building 2 separate native apps.
And the second thing is the complexity of your product i.e. how many features and functionality it has.
A fintech app handling payments, compliance, and multiple user roles will always cost more than a single-purpose utility app, regardless of platform.
Need a software product?
We have a dedicated team just for you.
You’ll be talking with our technology experts.
But, you can reduce these costs by building a a minimum viable product (MVP) first.
We always encourage our clients to build an MVP first, even for complex ideas or enterprise-grade products. An MVP strips your product down to its core features so you can validate demand before investing in full-scale development.
It’s the cheapest way to avoid building something nobody wants.
A good, well-balanced development team is essential for successful software product development.
A larger team can work faster but increases the overall cost, while a smaller team might be cheaper but will take longer to develop your product.
An experienced team will also work faster and make fewer mistakes – but that expertise will cost you.
Senior talent isn’t cheap, though. Glassdoor puts the average senior software engineer salary in the US at $208,000-210,500 a year, with a range up to $267,000 depending on location and specialization.
So, what are your options when hiring a team?
The first is hiring a whole in-house team – but keep in mind that even just hiring and onboarding them comes with a lot of added costs.
source: Scribe
According to SHRM, the average onboarding cost is $5475 per new hire – so, just onboarding a team of 5 engineers will cost you over $27,000.
The second option is hiring a group of freelancers to work on your product.
This is a much cheaper option but it has major downsides like the difficulty of coordinating them and quality issues.
And that’s why hiring a dedicated team is the best of both worlds.
The right dedicated team will feel just like an in-house team and it’s cheaper than hiring an in-house team and more reliable than hiring freelancers.
And the best part?
When you hire a dedicated team, you also gain a long-term development partnership.
Good UX pays for itself, and we’d still be careful with anyone who quotes you a fixed return on it.
We’ve seen products fail because onboarding confused users in the first minute, not because a feature was missing.
So, investing in UX is an absolute must.
But, if you have a complex UX/UI design, the costs can quickly add up.
Complex animations, custom interaction patterns, and fully bespoke design systems all push cost up. A design built from pre-made components is always cheaper than one drawn from scratch.
However, the best way to reduce your UX/UI design costs is thoroughly researching your target audience and getting their feedback early.
Talk to your real users before you commit to a direction.
Redoing an interface after launch, once you’ve discovered it doesn’t work, costs far more than getting it close to right the first time.
A tech stack is the collection of languages, frameworks, and tools used to build your product.
The right combination depends on your platform, your requirements, and what your team already knows well.
Here’s what a typical web app tech stack looks like:
In other words, a tech stack is the toolkit your engineers will use to develop your product – and you want them to have the right tools for the job.
A number of different factors will influence your choice, like:
Pick tools your engineers know and they start building immediately instead of having to learn the tool first.
Frameworks like React for web and Flutter or React Native for cross-platform mobile still hold up well in 2026 for exactly this reason: mature ecosystems, large talent pools, and faster development than reinventing the parts yourself.
Of course, AI coding agents have made switching languages and frameworks much easier than before. But, sticking to tools your team is already familiar with is still a good idea.
Regular maintenance and updates are key for your software product’s long-term success.
They will keep your product functional, secure, and relevant in a highly competitive market.
But, maintenance and update costs add up quickly.
And over your product’s lifetime, they account for over 50% of the total cost of ownership (TCO).
source: LinkedIn
There are 4 types of software maintenance:
A general rule of thumb is budgeting 20% of your initial development cost for maintenance annually.
That sounds like a lot, but it’s also key to your product’s long-term success.
A 2025 UK consumer survey by Amplitude found that 58% of users would abandon a brand entirely after running into problems with its mobile app, and over a third said they’d stop using a glitchy app within minutes.
Regular maintenance and updates will stop that from happening to your product.
If you’re hiring a dedicated team from a software development vendor, one major cost factor will be the pricing model you agree on.
There are 2 main pricing models – fixed-price and time and materials. Here’s a in-depth overview of both:
Fixed-price vs. time and materials: overview
| Category | Fixed-price | Time and materials |
| Best for | Well-defined projects with clear requirements and scope | Complex projects with unclear requirements that can change mid-development |
| Cost structure | Fixed, predefined cost for the entire project | Flexible, based on the actual hours worked and resources used |
| Flexibility | Very low, any changes to the scope need to be negotiated separately | Highly flexible, scope and cost can change dynamically with no issues |
| Risk for client | Lower risk, the client knows the cost upfront | Higher risk, total cost can increase if the project takes longer or needs more resources than expected |
| Risk for vendor | Higher risk, the vendor might underestimate the effort and resources required | Lower risk, the vendor gets paid for all the work completed, regardless of changes in scope or delays |
| Client involvement | Usually low, the client defines the scope upfront and waits for deliverables | Usually high, the client is involved in decisions about scope changes and resources used |
In short, Fixed-price is where you agree to a set rate at the beginning of your product’s development.
It’s a good choice if you have a simple project with well-defined requirements and you’re afraid of overpaying.
But, if your requirements change mid-development (which happens often!), every change request will cost you extra.
And that can quickly add up – that’s why the time and materials model is a better choice.
It’s the fairest compensation model for both clients and vendors, because it matches the actual hours and resources used to build your product.
Compliance adds real cost to a project, and it’s cheaper to budget for it upfront.
If your product touches healthcare data, payment information, or EU user data, frameworks like HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and GDPR aren’t optional extras.
Building compliance in from the start typically adds 15-25% to your development cost.
That covers encryption standards, audit logs (a record of who changed what and when), access controls, and rules about which country your data sits in.
Keeping that compliance current runs another 15-20% of your original development cost each year. Audits and certifications like SOC 2 or HIPAA assessments cost $5,000-50,000 a year on top of that, depending on scope.
source: BlastAsia
Retrofitting compliance into a product that wasn’t designed for it costs dramatically more than building it in from day one.
We’ve seen companies try to bolt encryption and access controls onto a live product, and it’s always slower and more expensive than doing it once, properly.
Almost no modern product exists in isolation.
It connects to payment processors, CRMs, analytics platforms, or industry-specific systems.
Individual integrations typically cost $2,000-30,000 depending on the complexity of the API, the quality of its documentation, and how much custom logic sits on your side of the connection.
A well-documented API with a mature software development kit (SDK) is cheap to integrate. A legacy system with sparse documentation and no test environment can eat weeks of engineering time you didn’t plan for.
Map every integration your product needs before development starts, and get an engineer to read each API’s documentation.
A vague “we’ll connect to Stripe and Salesforce” in a scoping document is not the same as knowing what those integrations require.
Where your team is based is another major cost factor, even
Rates vary by region and by role. Here’s what you can expect to pay for the roles on a typical project:
Average hourly development rates by region
| Region | Software engineer | Solution Architect | UX/UI designer | Project manager |
| Western Europe | $100-160 | $130-220 | $80-140 | $100-160 |
| Central Europe | $30-65 | $45-90 | $25-55 | $35-70 |
| Eastern Europe | $25-55 | $40-70 | $20-40 | $30-55 |
| Asia | $18-60 | $30-85 | $18-55 | $25-70 |
| North America | $80-150 | $100-200 | $70-120 | $75-140 |
| Latin America | $25-60 | $40-80 | $20-45 | $30-65 |
| Africa | $15-45 | $25-65 | $15-35 | $20-55 |
That range has moved both ways over the past year. Outsourcing rates fell across most major regions through 2025 as competition and a growing pool of AI-augmented developers pushed prices down, and Latin America saw the sharpest drop at 7.1% year-on-year.
Qubit Labs now expects mid-level and senior rates to rise 3-6% in 2026. Rates fell hard in 2025 and are now ticking back up.
In-house engineers in the US, Canada, and parts of Western Europe earn the highest salaries, often above $100,000 a year before onboarding and benefits.
And here’s the most important point: chasing the cheapest hourly rate costs more in the long run. Especially once you count coordination work, time zone friction, and the quality problems that show up in production.
Nearshore and EU-based teams charge more per hour, but the total cost of ownership, meaning everything you spend on the product over its life, often comes out lower.
Not on the hourly rate. The savings show up in the timeline, and only on certain kinds of work.
AI doesn’t replace engineers. It changes what they spend their time on.
A lot of engineering time goes to repetitive work that agentic tools now handle a large share of:
That frees senior engineers for architecture and the judgment calls that decide whether a product holds up.
It’s also where the pitch gets oversold. AI-assisted development cuts implementation time on well-defined, routine work. It does nothing about the need for senior review.
Teams that treat it as a substitute for engineering judgment end up with more rework in the long run. The savings only show up when experienced engineers supervise the output.
That’s how we run agentic engineering: senior engineers direct AI tools on the repetitive parts of the work, and every output gets reviewed before it ships. That’s what actually cuts timelines.
So when a quote comes in low because “AI makes us faster,” ask which parts of the work it makes faster and who reviews what comes out.
A faster timeline on routine work is a real saving. A cheaper quote with no senior review just moves that cost into the rework.
You’re not required to prepare anything – you can simply bring your idea and goals.
But, to make the first call more productive and get the most value, it helps to share:
The more context you give us, the quicker we can spot challenges, share actionable insights, and suggest the right next steps during our first meeting.
3 words — The feedback loop.
The single most important method for product growth. We’ll set up the feedback loop for your MVP with all the various analytics tools we use, and we’ll help you analyze user data coming in. Once we’ve identified the most important feedback, we’ll translate it into features your users will love. This process can go on indefinitely and each iteration will make your product better than before.
The most useful starting point is a feature list and any planned integrations, as these help us scope the work and prepare an early estimate.
If you also have Figma designs, wireframes, or a product roadmap, we can give you a more accurate estimate with a clear picture of the effort, timeline, and resources required.
Even before a formal meeting, we can provide a very rough ballpark estimate based on this information so you know what to expect before going deeper into planning.
If you’ve spent the last few weeks comparing quotes and getting a different number from every vendor, you’re not doing anything wrong.
Cost varies this much, and anyone who gives you a single number without asking questions first isn’t being straight with you.
We’re a full-service software development partner built around senior engineers. You get a team that scopes the work honestly, tells you which parts are worth paying more for, and stays committed to your product instead of rotating off it at the earliest opportunity.
Whether you need a discovery phase to validate your idea or a full team ready to build your product, tell us what you’re planning and we’ll come back with a number grounded in what your product needs.
Ante is a true expert. Another graduate from the Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, he’s been a DECODEr from the very beginning. Ante is an experienced software engineer with an admirably wide knowledge of tech. But his superpower lies in iOS development, having gained valuable experience on projects in the fintech and telco industries. Ante is a man of many hobbies, but his top three are fishing, hunting, and again, fishing. He is also the state champ in curling, and represents Croatia on the national team. Impressive, right?
Choosing the right software development vendor is key if you want to build a successful product. Here, we'll guide you through that process.
Software product development is a great opportunity for your business - here, we'll show you how to build a software product, step-by-step.
