8 biggest risks of build-operate-transfer (BOT) in software development you need to know

Building a engineering operation in a different country takes a lot of work.

The build-operate-transfer (BOT) model gives you a faster, lower risk way to do it, but only if you manage it well.

It looks straightforward, but there’s a lot that can go wrong.

Choosing the wrong partner or signing an unclear contract can slow everything down and push costs higher. And once you’re locked in, changing course takes a lot time and effort.

The good news? You can avoid that. Most BOT risks are predictable and preventable.

When you plan carefully and stay involved, you keep control and build an operation that actually works.

In this article, we’ll go over the 8 biggest risks of BOT in software development and how to handle each one before it derails your project.

Let’s dive in!

Choosing the wrong BOT partner

Everything starts with choosing the right BOT partner.

Pick the wrong one and you’ll face constant setbacks, slow delivery, and costs that keep climbing.

Where most companies go wrong is simple. They choose based on promises, not proof.

Some vendors can talk strategy but struggle with execution. Others know the local market but don’t have the structure or talent pipeline to scale quickly enough.

Before you sign, check the essentials:

• Relevant experience: Ask for similar projects they’ve set up or scaled, even if they’re not full BOT transfers. Talk to their past clients to learn how they handled recruitment, delivery, and team management.
• Local presence: Make sure they have full-time recruiters, not freelancers. Ask how many hires they’ve made recently and how long it took.
• Technical depth: Check how they assess candidates and maintain engineering standards. Ask for a sample test or their review process.
• Contingency plan: Define what happens if milestones slip or candidates don’t pass. Get it in writing.

You can also run a quick scenario test.

Share a one-page brief and ask for the first 90 days.

You want specifics: roles to hire, KPIs to hit, environments to set up, and how quality will be measured.

If you get a pretty Gantt chart and no operational detail, move on.

A few extra weeks of vetting now will save you months of cleanup later. Choose the partner who can show how they’ll deliver, not just tell you they can.

Poorly-defined contracts

BOT contracts can get very complex.

They cover everything from setup and operations to KPIs, transfer terms, and IP ownership.

The problem? The more complex the contract, the easier it is for things to slip through the cracks.

One vague clause can turn into a months-long dispute down the line.

100+ projects delivered. We’re ready for yours. Let’s talk →

You’ll be talking with our technology experts.

Most issues come down to poor definitions.

If performance metrics aren’t crystal clear, you’ll end up arguing about whether the partner actually met their obligations. And if the transfer terms are too broad, you might struggle to take full control when the time comes.

Here’s what you need to pay extra attention to:

• Performance metrics – Define measurable KPIs, like uptime, hiring timelines, and defect rates, with clear success criteria.
• Risk allocation – Spell out who’s responsible for what. For example, who covers delays caused by failed third-party integrations?
• Transfer conditions – Set milestones, required documentation, and a specific timeline for handover.
• Change management – Include how scope or cost changes are approved and tracked.

Don’t leave anything open to “mutual agreement later.” That’s a recipe for disaster.

Also, most BOT deals are cross-border. A clause that’s standard in one legal system might be invalid in another.

That’s why you need lawyers who understand both software development and international contracts. They’ll spot the language that could hurt you if things go wrong.

Who owns what is one of the most common pain points in BOT projects.

Some unscrupulous vendors might try to retain rights to frameworks or utilities they developed “along the way.” Others bury transfer fees in the fine print.

That’s why your contract should explicitly state:

• All work products, source code, and documentation belong to you.
• Any shared tools or frameworks the vendor provides must remain accessible after transfer.
• Include an escrow arrangement for key assets to protect your access in case of disputes.

If you can, have the contract reviewed by an expert who’s managed BOT transfers before.

Because when you’re investing millions into a multi-year project, vague language only creates risk.

Hidden costs

The BOT model isn’t cheap to start.

Before your team ships a single line of code, you’re already paying for recruitment, office space, legal setup, and infrastructure.

You can easily spend 3 to 6 months in pure setup mode before the team becomes productive. If the project stalls or fails before transfer, that money’s gone.

BOT projects front-load expenses, such as:

• Office setup: rent, utilities, IT equipment, and security.
• Recruitment: local hiring teams, candidate sourcing, onboarding.
• Legal and compliance: entity registration, labor contracts, and tax advisory.
• Initial training: aligning new hires with your tools, processes, and quality standards.

Those costs add up fast, especially when you’re hiring senior talent in a competitive market.

Also, make sure your contract doesn’t hide fees in the fine print. Some vendors charge separately for knowledge transfer, documentation, or post-transfer support.

Before you sign, insist on:

• Itemized transfer cost estimates with clear deliverables.
• Caps on transfer fees to prevent last-minute surprises.
• Payment milestones tied to completed and approved handover stages.
• Transparency around any third-party or legal costs tied to the transfer.

And international BOT deals add another layer of risk and extra costs – currency fluctuations and local inflation.

A 10% currency swing can turn your projected savings into losses.

And economic instability in the vendor’s country can threaten the viability of your BOT set up.

Hidden costs can derail even the best BOT strategy, so you need to plan for them upfront.

It’s the only way to protect your investment.

Quality control and performance issues

During the build and operate phases, the vendor you hire runs the show.

They handle everything from recruitment and HR to facilities and day-to-day operations.

That’s a lot of trust to place in another company. And if they drop the ball, you take the hit.

You need to keep an eye out for:

• Poor hiring standards – The vendor rushes recruitment to hit deadlines, leading to junior-heavy teams or mismatched skill sets.
• Lack of code review discipline – Engineers skip code reviews under pressure, and technical debt builds up fast.
• Inconsistent QA coverage – Automated tests exist only on paper, and releases rely too much on manual checks.
• High turnover during the operate phase – Senior engineers leave before transfer, taking critical knowledge with them.
• Slow response to production issues – Vendor support teams work across multiple clients and miss your SLAs.

Each of these issues directly affects delivery quality, morale, and ultimately, the value you get from the BOT arrangement.

Service Level Agreements (SLAs) help, but only if they’re specific and measurable.

Vague promises like “high quality” or “timely delivery” mean nothing when things go wrong.

You need to define success with clear metrics you can track:

• Hiring timeline: 4–6 weeks to fill senior roles.
• Sprint velocity: no more than 10% variance per quarter.
• Defect density: below 1 per 1,000 lines of code.
• Team stability: maximum 10% attrition during operate phase.

Don’t rely only on the vendor’s account manager. Stay in contact with the actual team leads and engineers.

Regular one-on-one syncs or joint retrospectives will help you catch small issues before they turn into big ones.

As you move toward transfer, your goal should be to make yourself less dependent on the vendor. The operate phase is when you begin taking real ownership, both on the technical and operational side.

You need to start preparing months in advance:

• Document everything early – Tools, processes, contacts, and workflows.
• Pair teams – Have your internal ops and HR shadow the vendor’s staff.
• Track handover progress – Maintain a transfer checklist with owners and deadlines.

Quality and performance don’t manage themselves.

Stay close to the work, track progress, and keep high standards visible every day.

That’s how you build a team that delivers long after transfer.

Communication and cultural barriers

When teams come from different countries, time zones, and work cultures, small misunderstandings can snowball into bigger problems.

What feels like “clear and direct” feedback to you might sound aggressive to someone else. What seems like indecision to you might actually be a culture that values consensus.

And bad cultural compatibility can completely derail your BOT setup.

Here are some common issues you need to be aware of:

• Different attitudes toward hierarchy – In some countries, engineers hesitate to challenge senior managers or clients. You might expect open debate in sprint retros, but they stay quiet out of respect.
• Feedback style – Western European or U.S. teams often prefer direct feedback, while teams in Asia might find that tone overly harsh or personal.
• Decision-making speed – Some cultures prefer fast, independent decision-making, while others expect approval from multiple layers of management before acting.
• Work–life balance expectations – Late-night messages might seem normal to one side and intrusive to the other.
• Language nuances – Even when everyone speaks English, tone and phrasing can cause confusion. “We’ll try” might mean “we’ll do our best” or “we likely won’t make it.”

These differences might sound small, but they can impact everything from sprint planning to delivery timelines.

And cultural understanding doesn’t happen on its own. You need to make it happen.

Start by setting clear communication protocols early in the project:

• Shared work hours – Agree on overlapping time slots for real-time discussions.
• Defined feedback channels – Use documented retrospectives and written updates to avoid misinterpretation.
• Decision logs – Keep records of who decided what, and why, to reduce confusion later.
• Communication tools – Standardize the toolset you use. For example, use Slack for daily syncs, Jira for tracking tasks, and Confluence for documentation.

It’s also a good idea to run cultural awareness sessions for both sides, especially if your BOT partner is from a culturally distant country.

Not every vendor can bridge the cultural gap. Some have deep experience working with Western clients and already know how to blend communication styles. Others don’t.

Cultural fit is essential for a successful BOT engagement.

You need to pick a partner who understands how you work and bridge the gap before it becomes a problem.

Compliance and legal risks

Compliance is one of the biggest hidden risks in BOT projects.

When your team operates in another country, you’re dealing with different set of laws around data, employment, and taxes.

And you’re still responsible for data compliance, even if the vendor manages operations.

GDPR in the EU, CCPA in California, and local data protection laws all have different standards.

Before you start, make sure your vendor can meet your compliance bar.

Build those requirements directly into your BOT agreement. Include clauses for:

• Data residency – Define where customer data is stored and processed.
• Security standards – Encryption, access control, and data retention policies.
• Audit rights – Your ability to independently verify compliance.
• Incident response – Clear escalation steps if a breach happens.

Here’s a simple example: if your app collects EU user data but your BOT team operates in India or the Philippines, you may need to set up EU-hosted servers to stay GDPR-compliant.

Every country handles employment differently. And those rules become your responsibility once the transfer happens.

Some countries require long notice periods for termination or mandatory severance pay.

Others limit working hours or enforce strict overtime rules. If your vendor cuts corners during setup, you’ll inherit those problems along with the team.

Watch out for:

• Incorrect employment classifications – Contractors treated as full-time employees.
• Missing benefits contributions – Unpaid social, pension, or health obligations.
• Invalid contracts – Employment contracts breaking local labor laws.
• Unlawful termination practices – Dismissing employees without proper documentation or cause.

You don’t want to only find out about these issues during the transfer phase.

Work with local employment lawyers early on and verify the vendor’s HR policies and payroll records before signing off.

Operating across borders also introduces tax complexity. You could face new corporate taxes, payroll taxes, or transfer pricing issues depending on how your BOT contract is structured.

Before committing, bring in an international tax advisor. Make sure you understand:

• Which taxes apply during the operate phase vs. after transfer.
• Whether your company will be treated as a permanent establishment in that country.
• What happens to tax obligations once ownership changes.

Compliance issues don’t show up right away. Instead, they hit at the worst possible time: during transfer.

And the only safe approach is to bake compliance into your BOT engagement from day one.

Poor recruitment and talent retention

Building a strong team in another country is one of the hardest parts of a BOT setup.

Top engineers have plenty of options, and they won’t jump at a new operation with an uncertain future.

If your BOT partner doesn’t have a strong local brand or technical credibility, they’ll struggle to attract senior talent.

That’s when shortcuts creep in: rushed hiring, weak vetting, and generic job descriptions that don’t match your needs just to fill up seats.

And your team grow quickly on paper but won’t have the depth to actually deliver.

Here are some common recruitment issues you should watch out for:

• Wrong technical skills – Developers hired for “Java experience” who’ve never touched your frameworks or architecture.
• Speed over quality – Roles filled fast to hit targets, not because the candidates can actually do the job.
• No cultural screening – Hiring people that don’t fit your working style or communication habits.

Stay hands-on during recruitment. Have your senior engineers join interviews and clearly define technical and soft-skill requirements.

But, even if you build the right team, keeping them motivated is another challenge.

Developers in a BOT setup know they’ll eventually switch employers – from the vendor to you. That uncertainty can make retention harder.

To avoid this, build loyalty from day one:

• Communicate directly with the team – Don’t let the vendor be their only point of contact.
• Share your long-term vision – Show them how they’ll grow with your company after transfer.
• Reward commitment – Use retention bonuses or milestone-based incentives to keep motivation high.
• Invest in career development – Give them a reason to see a future beyond the vendor phase.

Keep a buffer in your hiring plan and document processes thoroughly. And maintain strong relationships with the engineers long before they join you officially.

Recruitment can fill the seats, but retention decides whether your investment pays off.

Inadequate infrastructure setup

The infrastructure your vendor builds is the technical foundation you’ll inherit.

And if it’s weak, you’ll have to spend months (and a lot of money) fixing it.

During the build phase, your BOT partner sets up everything: cloud infrastructure, DevOps pipelines, internal tools, and security systems.

If they pick the wrong stack or cut corners, you’ll be stuck with technical debt you didn’t plan for.

Don’t let the vendor decide your tech stack in isolation. You’re the one who’ll live with it after transfer.

Your BOT contract should spell out:

• Preferred cloud provider(s) and region requirements.
• Development tools and integrations that align with your internal systems.
• Architecture principles, e.g. modular, cloud-native, scalable.
• DevOps standards for CI/CD, monitoring, and observability.
• Backup and disaster recovery procedures.

Review infrastructure decisions regularly during the build phase. It’s easier to course-correct early than rebuild everything later.

Many vendors focus on getting you live fast, not on what happens when your team grows or traffic spikes.. They design infrastructure for today’s 10 developers, not tomorrow’s 50.

That short-term mindset can create huge problems later. You need to make scalability part of your plan from the start.

Make sure the setup can handle more users, more data, and a bigger team. Test how it performs under pressure before transfer.

And keep an eye out for security lapses during setup. Bake security into every stage:

• Include specific security standards (like ISO 27001 or SOC 2) in your contract.
• Require regular security audits and vulnerability scans.
• Set up access control and monitoring from day one.
• Treat incident response as a shared responsibility between yourself and the vendor.

Certifications are a good start, but they’re not a guarantee. You need to verify their implementation.

In BOT, you’re not just building for launch. You’re building the foundation for your future engineering team.

BOT risks: FAQs

Need a reliable BOT partner?

The BOT model isn’t something you rush. It takes structure, experience, and constant communication to get it right.

But when you do, you build an operation that’s fully yours, built to scale and run independently.

With the right partner, every stage of the process becomes smoother, every risk easier to manage, and every decision made with long-term success in mind.

If you want to explore how BOT could work for your business, let’s talk. We’ll show you what the process looks like and how to make it work from day one.