Too many companies jump in without a clear plan and pick the wrong partner, misjudge the budget, or lock themselves into the wrong model.
And the result? Wasted time, blown budgets, and products that never make it.
It doesn’t have to be that way.
With the right approach, outsourcing can help you move faster, tap into real expertise, and build better software – without the overhead of hiring in-house.
In this article, we’ll break down the entire process, from figuring out if you should outsource, to signing the right contracts and kicking off the project.
Let’s dive in!
Table of Contents
When should you outsource software development?
Outsourcing works when you’re trying to move fast, reduce risk, and avoid building a huge in-house team too early.
But that doesn’t mean it’s always the right call.
Here are the most common reasons to outsource:
You’re building your first product – You need to move fast, test ideas, and want to avoid long-term hiring commitments. A product-focused partner will help you validate before you scale.
Your internal team is overloaded – If you’re facing tight deadlines and your devs are already stretched thin, outsourcing lets you keep shipping without burning out your team.
You’re missing key skills – Whether it’s mobile, backend, QA, or DevOps, outsourcing gives you access to specialists without the time and cost of hiring full-time.
You need flexibility – Product priorities can shift fast. An outsourced team can ramp up or down depending on your needs without hiring freezes or layoff stress.
Your budget has limits – Hiring a full in-house team is expensive. Outsourcing helps you build high-quality software while keeping fixed costs low.
You want to reduce risk – Working with a team that’s done it before helps you avoid the common traps like scope creep, bad architecture, or rework.
Outsourcing isn’t about cutting corners. It’s about choosing the right people to build the right thing – so you can focus on the bigger picture.
But don’t outsource just because it’s cheaper. If cost is your only reason, you’ll pick the wrong partner.
100+ projects delivered. We’re ready for yours. Let’s talk →
You’ll be talking with our technology experts.
Cheap code without product thinking leads to expensive mistakes. Your goal shouldn’t just be to spend less, it should be to spend smarter.
And that means choosing a team that’s aligned with your goals, takes ownership, and communicates clearly.
Next, we’ll show you how to do just that.
How to successfully outsource development
Here, we’ll show you how to successfully outsource development, step-by-step.
Define your goals and success criteria first
This is where outsourcing succeeds or fails. If your goals are vague, your results won’t be any better..
You need to start by getting brutally clear on why you’re building the product. Then define what success actually looks like – for you, your team, and your users.
“I want an app” isn’t a goal.
Here’s what is:
Launch an MVP in 3 months to validate demand
Rebuild an outdated mobile app to improve UX and retention
Add a new payment feature that works across EU markets
Also, the more specific your goal, the better.
If you’re not sure how to get there, the SMART goals framework is a good place to start:
Here’s a couple of SMART goals, for reference:
Cut user onboarding time by 50% within the next 3 months
Increase app store rating from 3.8 to 4.5 or higher within 4 months after key updates
Reach 5,000 active users within 6 months
Goals like these will help you keep everyone on the same page throughout development and define what your product needs to achieve.
But, your goals almost certainly go beyond your product.
Maybe success means getting investor-ready. Maybe it means freeing up your internal team. Maybe it’s just shipping something on time without losing sleep.
Write it down and share it with your potential partner. A good team will tailor the engagement around that.
Remember, a good partner doesn’t just want a brief – they want to understand the problem behind it.
The more they understand, the more they can contribute. Not just code, but ideas for improvement, too.
Once you’re on the same page, everything else becomes easier: budgeting, timelines, team structure, and delivery.
And that’s why this step is so important.
Set your initial budget
A lot of projects fail because of bad budgeting, not bad tech.
It’s easy to burn through your funds without even noticing. One extra feature. One delay. One change in direction. Suddenly, you’re out of runway.
And the stats back that up. According to McKinsey, 66% of large IT projects end up going over budget:
Team augmentation vs. dedicated team vs. project-based model: comparison
Category
Team augmentation
Dedicated team
Project-based model
Best for
Scaling existing teams
Long-term, strategic development partnership
One-off, end-to-end projects
Commitment
Short to mid-term
Long-term
Project-based
Cost efficiency
Lower upfront cost, but long-term expenses vary
Higher, but more scalable and efficient over time
Fixed project costs, depends on scope and complexity
Speed to start
Quick onboarding, quickly fills skill gaps
Slower, requires onboarding and long-term planning
Varies, depends on project scope
Example use case
A company that needs 2 extra backend developers for 4 months
A Fortune 500 company hiring a team for long-term product development
A company without an in-house team outsourcing mobile app development
Team augmentation is perfect if you need to extend your internal team with external experts to fill skill gaps or temporarily boost capacity.
A dedicated team, on the other hand, is ideal when you’re building a product from the ground up and need a long-term, focused development team you can trust.
Finally, the project-based model is a good fit when you have a clearly defined scope and just need a team to get your project across the line.
You also have to choose the right pricing model. Here, you have 2 options: fixed-price and time and materials.
Here’s a quick overview of their key differences:
Fixed-price vs. time and materials: overview
Category
Fixed-price
Time and materials
Best for
Small, well-defined projects
Long-term, evolving projects
Budget control
High, costs are agreed upfront
Varies, costs depend on hours worked
Flexibility
Very low, any changes require renegotiation
High, you can adapt as the project evolves
Development speed
Usually slower because of more rigid planning
Faster, teams can shift focus as priorities change
Scope changes
Costly and difficult to implement
Easy to accommodate
Example project
MVP with a detailed feature list and tight launch
SaaS product
The fixed-price model works if your scope is clear and well-defined.
But, there’s a catch – any changes you make to the original scope have to be negotiated separately and you’ll have to pay extra.
The time and materials model, on the other hand, is a fairer pricing model – you pay for the time spent and resources actually used during development.
It’s a much better fit if you need flexibility or if your project’s scope changes mid-development.
The model(s) you choose shape every aspect of collaboration with your outsourcing partner.
So, you can’t afford to get this wrong.
Start searching and create a shortlist
Finding the right partner isn’t about volume.
You don’t need twenty proposals. You need a small list of teams who actually get what you’re trying to build.
So, where should you start?
Begin with your network. Ask founders, PMs, and engineers you trust – personal referrals are often the most reliable source.
Then go deeper. Use Google to find companies who offer the services you’re looking for.
Visit their websites, but don’t just skim the homepage – read their case studies, look at how they write, and pay attention to how they talk about process, not just results.
Here’s what you should look for:
Transparency – Do they explain their process? Share how they collaborate? Publish valuable and technical content?
Focus – Do they try to do everything? Or are they clearly product-minded with deep technical experience?
Team structure – Can you tell how many people work there? Are they a one-person show or a real team with processes and structure?
Relevant experience – Have they built products like yours? For your market? On your platform?
Case studies with detail – Look for clear outcomes, not fluff. What problem did they solve? How? What did they actually build?
Next, you want to narrow down your initial list. Check third-party review platforms like:
Look at real client reviews, not just five-star ratings. This will help you create a focused shortlist.
Narrow it down to 3-5 potential partners max. That’s enough to compare their approaches, pricing, and chemistry without drowning in back-and-forth.
Reach out with a clear brief. Not just “we want an app,” but what problem you want to solve, who (you think) your users are, and what success looks like.
The good ones will follow up with smart questions, not just a price tag.
You’re not just looking for someone who says yes to everything. You want a partner who challenges your vague ideas, sharpens your scope, and brings product thinking to the table.
Vet the shortlist
This is where things get real.
You’ve found a few promising partners, now it’s time to find out who can actually deliver and who just knows how to sell.
Now, the vetting process isn’t about finding the flashiest pitch. It’s about finding the team that fits how you work and thinks like you do.
This is important because cultural incompatibility is one of the main reasons why outsourced projects fail.
First, though, you should start with the basics.
Before diving into their processes and culture, make sure the fundamentals are in place:
Do they have experience with products like yours?
Have they worked with companies at your stage?
Can they scale the team up or down if needed?
Are they open about how they price and deliver?
If any of that’s unclear, ask directly. A strong partner will explain without hesitation.
Then, you need to dig deeper. Don’t stop at “how do you work?”, ask:
Who exactly will be working on my product?
How do you handle changing priorities or scope?
How do you ensure quality throughout the process?
What happens when something goes wrong?
How often will I hear from the team?
Can I speak directly with everyone on the team?
Also, you don’t want a team that blindly follows instructions – you want a team that takes ownership and asks “why” as much as “how.”
If the team you’re vetting asks thoughtful questions about your goals, not just the features they’ll build, that’s a green flag.
Skills matter. But like we mentioned, a bad cultural fit kills more projects than bad code ever will.
If the vibe feels off, trust your gut. This needs to be a long-term relationship, not a one-off transaction.
Vetting isn’t about filtering out the weak. It’s about finding the team that can take your project to the next level.
Do it right, and you’ll avoid the pain of switching partners mid-project. Do it well, and you’ll find a team that builds better than you imagined.
Start small and test the waters
Before you commit to a long-term partnership, you should run a small test – especially if your project is a huge commitment.
You’ll learn more from two weeks of real work than hours of meetings and sales calls.
Even the most promising partner on paper might not be the right fit in practice.
A small test project shows how they really work:
Do they hit deadlines?
Do they ask smart questions?
Are they product-minded or just code monkeys?
Do they communicate clearly and often?
So, what should a test project look like?
It depends on what you’re building and where you’re starting from.
Here are a few low-commitment ways you should consider:
Adiscovery sprint to explore features, tech, and scope
AUX workshop to validate your design direction
Aprototype or clickable mockup
Afeature spike to test out backend or mobile functionality
These don’t take long and a good team can complete them in 1–2 weeks. You’ll walk away with something tangible – code, designs, documentation, or new insights.
The goal isn’t just to build something. It’s to see how they operate under pressure.
Pay attention to how quickly they ramp up, how they handle feedback, and whether they own their tasks or need hand-holding.
Test projects help you avoid costly mistakes like picking the wrong partner or starting without enough context.
It’s better to learn those lessons early, when you still have time to adjust. So, don’t skip this and don’t rush the relationship.
Sign the right contracts
You’ve picked your partner and tested how you work together. Now it’s time to make it official.
This isn’t just legal paperwork, it’s protection – for your product, your IP, and your budget.
Don’t treat this step as a formality. Get it right, and you’ll avoid surprises down the line.
The NDA is simple but important. It ensures everything you share, like ideas, strategy, designs, and user data stays confidential.
You should have this signed before sharing anything detailed. If they push back, that’s a red flag.
The MSA is the backbone of your relationship and sets the rules of engagement with your partner going forward.
Finally, the SOW is your project blueprint and lays out the specific details for your project, like the scope, timelines, deliverables, and so on.
The most important thing you need to clarify is IP ownership. Make sure your contract states that all code, designs, and assets belong to you once paid for.
And even if the contract looks (and is) straightforward, have a lawyer review it – especially the MSA.
Take this step seriously, be clear and detailed. Because once the paperwork is signed, you’re not just a prospect anymore. You’re a partner.
Kick off the project
The contract’s signed. Now it’s time to for the magic to happen.
But before the first commit or sprint, you need a proper kickoff.
A good kickoff makes the difference between a smooth launch and weeks of confusion.
This is where everyone gets on the same page, responsibilities are clarified, and the real work begins.
So, how do you do it?
Start with a kickoff call. Don’t just send Slack invites and repo links, get everyone on a call – the whole team, on both sides.
Even if you already shared the SOW, walk through it again:
Revisit core features
Clarify priorities
Confirm any assumptions
Break down the first milestones
Good teams will challenge parts of the scope. That’s a good sign, it means they’re already thinking ahead.
Also, make sure you know exactly who’s doing what:
Who’s the main point of contact?
Who owns delivery on each side?
Who’s responsible for design, QA, dev, and planning?
This avoids the “wait, who’s handling that?” moments later on.
And don’t forget to give your team access to everything. Sounds obvious, we know, but it’s often overlooked.
Make sure the team has access to:
Repos and branches
Design files
Past research
Credentials and environments
Any relevant documentation
No one should be waiting around for a password or link three days in.
After the call, send a simple recap with the key takeaways, links to shared tools and documentation, assigned action items, and the date of the first sprint/milestone.
This will get everyone moving in the same direction.
The best kickoffs will feel like the start of something meaningful, not just another project.
Invest the time and make sure everyone is on the same page from the start.
A strong start makes everything that follows smoother, faster, and better.
How to outsource development: FAQs
Yes, you can maintain quality if you outsource development, as long as you choose the right partner and clearly communicate your requirements and expectations to potential partners.
Also, you need to have clear quality standards and communication protocols in place to find the right outsourcing partner.
Of course, you can combine in-house and outsourced development, depending on your specific needs.
For example, you can outsource non-core and specialized tasks while your in-house team handles mission-critical parts of the project.
In fact, a hybrid model like that is the best of both worlds – you save money on development without sacrificing quality.
But, you need to make sure the company you choose can work well with your in-house team. Ask them if they have experience collaborating closely with clients’ in-house teams and how they handle working with them.
You need to stay close to the work. You should:
Talk to the team directly
Get access to the tools they use
Clearly define their goals
In short, you should never feel like you’re on the outside looking in.
Want a long-term outsourcing partner?
Do you want to outsource development but can’t seem to find a partner you can trust for the long haul?
We’ve got you covered.
We’re an EU-based, full-service software development company with 12+ years of experience working on complex, high-stakes projects for some of the world’s biggest companies.
If you’re looking for a stable, experienced outsourcing partner you can rely on, you’re in the right place.
Feel free to reach out – our team will get back to you as soon as possible!
A seasoned software engineering executive, Marin’s role combines his in-depth understanding of software engineering processes (particularly mobile) with product and business strategies. Humbly boasting 20+ years of international experience at the forefront of telecoms, Marin knows how to create and deliver state of the art software products to businesses of all sizes. Plus, his skills as a lifelong basketball player mean he can lead a team to victory.
When he’s not hopping from meeting to meeting, you’ll find Marin listening to indie rock, or scouring the latest IT news.