Top 6 cross-platform mobile app development frameworks in 2025

14 min read
April 25, 2024

Cross-platform mobile app development is an increasingly popular approach to building mobile apps.

And for a good reason, too – it’s a fast, cost-effective way to build apps that can reach a wide audience.

But, you need to do it right – and to do that, you need the right tools for the job.

That’s why we’ll discuss the top 6 cross-platform mobile app development frameworks you should use in 2025.

If you’re an engineer looking to get into cross-platform development or a cost-conscious CTO looking to build an app with a wide reach, you’re in the right place.

Let’s dive in!

Why choose cross-platform app development?

Cross-platform apps can run on multiple operating systems, like Android and iOS, and are written from a single codebase, which means you don’t have to write separate code for each platform.

And the impact of this can’t be understated.

Cross-platform frameworks significantly speed up development – on average, using cross-platform frameworks reduces development time by about 30%.

How to improve your development teams productivity

Need a cross-platform app? Let’s talk

You’ll be talking with our technology experts.

The eBay Motors app is a great example. The team had under a year to build new fully-featured apps, from concept to launch, for both Android and iOS.

Since they were a small team, building 2 native apps in that timeframe was nearly impossible. But with Flutter, they managed to launch the beta version in 3 months and a full production app just a few months later.

And in an internal survey, 100% of developers on the eBay motors team said they enjoyed Flutter development more than iOS/Android and 70% thought it was at least twice as fast.

The top 6 cross-platform frameworks currently out there are:

  • Flutter
  • React Native
  • Kotlin Multiplatform
  • .NET MAUI
  • Ionic
  • NativeScript

Out of these, Flutter is the most popular, with React Native a close second.

According to the 2024 Stack Overflow Developer Survey, 9.4% of engineers use Flutter and 8.4% use React Native.

The others are a bit less popular, with .NET MAUI clocking in at 3.1% of engineers while 2.5% use Ionic.

Cross-platform mobile app development frameworks – comparison

If you’re just looking for a quick overview, we’ve got you covered. Here’s a quick comparison across key categories:

Cross-platform mobile app development frameworks: overview

FrameworkPlatformsMain benefitsMain flawsNotable apps
FlutteriOS, Android, Web, DesktopSuperior performance and UI consistencyLarger app size, Dart learning curveGoogle Pay, BMW, Alibaba, eBay Motors, Wolt
React NativeiOS, Android, WebLarge community and ecosystemPerformance overhead from bridge architectureFacebook, Instagram, Microsoft Outlook, Shopify
.NET MAUIiOS, Android, macOS, WindowsEnterprise integration and toolingMicrosoft ecosystem dependencyFidelity, NBC Sports Next, Azure mobile app
Kotlin MultiplatformiOS, Android, Web, Desktop, ServerNative UI with shared business logicLimited ecosystem maturityNetflix, Cash App, VMware, McDonald’s
IoniciOS, Android, WebWeb developer accessibilityPerformance limitations for complex appsSouthwest Airlines, Sanvello, Shipt
NativeScriptiOS, AndroidDirect native API accessSteeper learning curvePuma, Airbnb Design, Sennheiser

Next up, we’ll cover these frameworks in-depth.

Top cross-platform mobile app development frameworks

Here, we’ll discuss the frameworks we mentioned in more detail – their key features, pros and cons, and the top apps built using each framework.

Flutter

Flutter is an open-source front-end framework used to develop cross-platform apps.

Built by Google, Flutter compiles to native code, so your app will look and feel just like a native app – at a fraction of the cost it would take to 2 native apps.

It’s ideal for graphics-intensive applications with complex user interactions.

Under heavy computational loads, Flutter can consistently maintain 60fps performance while competing frameworks may drop to 45fps.

Flutter

Since it compiles to native ARM code, it ensures optimal performance on both iOS and Android devices.

And Flutter’s widget-based approach means every element of your app’s interface is a widget, from layout structures to visual elements like buttons and text.

This consistency makes Flutter particularly powerful for creating custom, brand-specific user experiences that maintain visual consistency across platforms.

Important features

  • Hot reload

In Flutter, you can see code changes in real-time and you don’t need to restart your app – this can save you a lot of time.

  • Expressive UI widgets

Flutter has a rich set of customizable widgets with per-pixel Skia rendering for adaptive, polished designs, so you can quickly create great-looking UIs for your app.

  • Firebase integration

Flutter easily integrates with Firebase, which simplifies back-end development for your app.

  • Fast performance

Compiled ahead-of-time to ARM/native code for smooth animations and swift startup.

  • Native feature access

Platform channels and an extensive plugin ecosystem help you tap into device APIs (camera, sensors, etc.) for native-like performance.

  • Strong support network

Flutter has a very active community and a huge package library (pub.dev) with a wide range of plugins and pre-built solutions for common app requirements.

Flutter pros and cons

Pros


  • Reusable UI components
  • Fast development
  • Strong community
  • Native-like performance

Cons


  • Limited third-party libraries
  • Large app size
  • High resource use

Apps built with Flutter

Some of the top apps built with Flutter are:

  • Google Pay
  • Alibaba
  • BMW
  • eBay Motors
  • Wolt
  • Tencent

React Native

React Native is an open-source front-end framework used to develop UIs for mobile apps.

Built by Meta and based on React, React Native combines React, a top Javascript library for UIs, with native mobile app development features and components.

This means that you can create cross-platform apps that feel and look like native apps.

React Native

React Native uses a bridge to connect JavaScript code with native platform APIs. That means you can tap into device-specific features without giving up code portability.

It also makes it easier to work with existing iOS or Android code – great if you’ve already invested in native development.

React Native is backed by Meta and has one of the biggest developer communities out there.

That means it has tons of third-party libraries, quick fixes for most issues, and well-written docs that make onboarding much easier

And that’s why it’s a good choice.

Important features

  • Native components

React Native allows you to use native components to create high-quality UIs for your app, making your cross-platform app feel and act like a native app.

  • Hot reloading

In React Native, you can instantly see the results of any code changes without restarting your app which speeds up development.

  • Extensive ecosystem

React Native can integrate with a huge number of libraries, tools, and frameworks to extend its functionality.

  • Declarative component model

You can use React paradigms (JSX, props, state) to build a clean, modular UI.

  • Continuous updates

Hermes engine support, auto-batching, Suspense, TypeScript default, improved bridging – just to name a few.

React Native pros and cons

Pros


  • Fast development
  • Code reusability
  • Community support

Cons


  • Complex updates
  • Difficult debugging

Apps built with React Native

Some of the top apps built with React Native are:

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Microsoft Outlook
  • Microsoft Teams
  • Amazon Shopping
  • Shopify

.NET MAUI

NET MAUI (Multi-Platform App UI) is Microsoft’s go-to framework for building cross-platform apps with a single codebase.

It’s the evolution of Xamarin and lets you build for iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows – all from one place, using .NET.

If you’re already working in the Microsoft ecosystem, it’s a natural next step.

You get access to familiar tooling, a huge library of resources, and solid security features without having to learn an entirely new language.

.NET MAUI

.NET MAUI uses a single project structure that targets multiple platforms at once.

That means less time managing separate codebases and more time building. You can still use platform-specific APIs when needed, so the end result feels native.

It integrates tightly with Visual Studio and VS Code, giving you powerful debugging, testing, and deployment tools.

Hot reload makes iteration fast, and support for MVVM patterns helps keep your codebase clean and testable.

.NET MAUI plays nicely with Azure, Microsoft 365, and existing .NET backends. It’s built for enterprise needs – security, compliance, and large-scale deployments are all baked in.

Important features

  • Single-project structure

You can use one C#/.NET project targeting Android, iOS, macOS, Windows, and Tizen – no need for platform-specific projects.

  • Native UI rendering

Uses each platform’s native UI controls under the hood for a true native look and feel.

  • Cross-platform UI and graphics engine

Includes layouts, controls (via XAML/C#), drawing canvas and shape support in a unified API.

  • .NET hot reload

You can modify XAML or C# code during runtime and instantly see changes without restarting the app

  • Blazor hybrid support

Hosts web UIs using BlazorWebView or HybridWebView to share web/native logic.

  • Visual Studio and .NET integration

Full IDE support, debugging tools, and extensive open-source libraries .

.NET MAUI pros and cons

Pros


  • Native UI
  • Big ecosystem
  • Integration options
  • Simplified workflow

Cons


  • Immature
  • Performance overhead
  • Microsoft dependence

Apps built with .NET MAUI

Some of the top apps built with .NET MAUI are:

  • Fidelity
  • NBC Sports Next
  • Red-Point
  • Azure mobile app
  • Finlocker

Kotlin Multiplatform

Kotlin Multiplatform is an open-source technology for cross-platform mobile app development.

It allows you to share business logic and code across multiple platforms, which speeds up development and reduces the potential for bugs.

Kotlin Multiplatform

And the best part?

Kotlin Multiplatform doesn’t prescribe a specific architecture or framework for UI development, so you can use native UI technologies.

This lets you modernize your tech stack without starting from scratch.

You can share core logic across iOS and Android – things like data models, networking, and business rules – while still building fully native UIs.

It’s a great fit if you want to move toward cross-platform but keep your existing native apps and teams in place.

And you can plug Kotlin Multiplatform into your current codebases with minimal disruption.

It integrates directly with Gradle, which makes managing dependencies and builds a lot simpler. That means faster setup, cleaner workflows, and no headaches during deployment

And that’s why it’s a great choice.

Important features

  • Code sharing across platforms

With Kotlin Multiplatform, you share code and business logic for multiple platforms without sacrificing your app’s user experience

  • Interoperability with native code

The code you write in Kotlin Multiplatform can seamlessly integrate with your existing iOS and Android codebases

  • Gradle support

Kotlin Multiplatform supports Gradle, a build automation tool, which simplifies dependency management and improves productivity.

  • Flexible code sharing

You can choose what to share – UI, logic, or partial modules, with optional Compose Multiplatform for shared UIs.

  • Production-ready framework

Backed by JetBrains and Google, Kotlin Multiplatform is a stable framework for mobile app development and expanding to web/desktop.

Kotlin Multiplatform pros and cons

Pros


  • Native-like performance
  • Growing ecosystem
  • Reduced code duplication

Cons


  • Still evolving
  • Limited library support
  • Best practices still lacking

Apps built with Kotlin Multiplatform

Some of the top apps built with Kotlin Multiplatform are:

  • Netflix
  • Cash App
  • McDonald’s
  • Bolt
  • VMware
  • Philips HealthSuite

Ionic

Ionic is an open-source UI toolkit used to build high-quality cross-platform mobile apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

It’s easy to learn, especially for web developers, and integrates with other popular frameworks and libraries like Angular and Vue.js.

Ionic

Ionic uses Capacitor to give you access to native mobile features, like camera, location, or push notifications.

So, while you’re building with web-based technologies, you’re still getting that native functionality.

The built-in CLI supports live reloads, so you can see changes as you go.

This speeds up development and keeps workflows simple and familiar for web teams moving into mobile.

And that’s why you should consider using it.

Important features

  • Uses web technologies

Ionic uses HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to build cross-platform mobile apps, so it’s an easy transition for web developers.

  • Capacitor

Ionic’s Capacitor is an open-source runtime environment with access to native mobile SDKs, so apps built in Ionic look and feel like native apps.

  • Live reload

Ionic’s command line interface (CLI) supports live reloading, so you can see any changes you make in real-time.

  • Adaptive UI components

Over 100 ready-to-use components (cards, lists, tabs, etc.) that can easily adapt to each platform’s design.

  • Themes and accessibility

Ionic has built-in support for light/dark modes, WCAG compliance, and deep theme customization .

Ionic pros and cons

Pros


  • Easy to use
  • React, Angular, and Vue integration
  • Strong community support
  • Easy testing and debugging

Cons


  • Performance issues with complex apps
  • Large app size

Apps built with Ionic

Some of the top apps built with Ionic are:

  • Southwest Airlines
  • Sanvello
  • Shipt
  • H&R Block
  • AirBus Helicopters
  • NHS

NativeScript

NativeScript is an open-source framework used to build native mobile apps on multiple platforms using JavaScript and TypeScript.

NativeScript gives you direct access to native iOS and Android APIs while still letting you write apps in JavaScript or TypeScript.

Unlike frameworks that rely on a bridge, there’s no extra layer, so you get better performance and tighter control over how your app runs.

And since the code is written in JavaScript or TypeScript and compiled to native code, you only need to write it once and deploy it on multiple platforms.

NativeScript

NativeScript skips the WebView entirely, so you get fully native UIs and better performance across the board.

Tools like LiveSync and Hot Module Replacement (HMR) let you see changes instantly, keeping development fast and iterative.

That said, working directly with native APIs means there’s more to learn.

You’ll need to understand platform-specific details—unlike frameworks that abstract all of that away.

But if performance and flexibility are your priorities, the trade-off might be worth it.

Important features

  • Direct access to APIs

You can use NativeScript to directly call into native APIs, so you have full use of native mobile functionalities.

  • Native UI

NativeScript doesn’t use WebView, so your app’s UI is truly native and has better performance.

  • LiveSync and Hot Module Replacement (HMR)

With its LiveSync and HMR features, you instantly see any changes you made without needing a restart.

  • Framework versatility

Supports Angular, Vue, React, Svelte, or vanilla TS/JS, giving you flexibility when it comes to architectural choices.

  • Rich tooling ecosystem

NativeScript comes with command-line tooling, Sidekick IDE, Playground for prototyping, and a plugin marketplace.

NativeScript pros and cons

Pros


  • Native performance
  • Access to native APIs
  • Flexibility

Cons


  • Small community
  • Steep learning curve

Apps built with NativeScript

Some of the top apps built with NativeScript are:

  • Puma
  • Airbnb Design
  • Sennheiser
  • SAP

How to choose the right cross-platform mobile app development framework?

Picking the right framework isn’t just about performance or popularity.

It’s about choosing what actually fits your team, your project, and your long-term plans.

The first thing you need to look at is your and your team’s expertise. The more familiar your are with the tech, the faster you can move. Here’s a couple of examples:

  • JavaScript teams will feel right at home with React Native or NativeScript.
  • .NET teams may prefer .NET MAUI since it builds on what they already know.
  • Flutter’s performance is solid, but it comes with a learning curve.

Then, there’s performance.

Not every app needs to push the limits. Focus on what it actually needs to do.

The more demanding the use case, the more carefully you need to match the framework.

For example, if you need complex animations or real-time updates, Flutter is likely your best bet.

You also need to think about maintenance and future-proofing – you don’t want to choose a framework that will leave you hanging a year from now.

Flutter (backed by Google) and React Native (backed by Meta) have strong communities and clear roadmaps for future development.

And .NET MAUI ties into Microsoft’s long-term enterprise vision.

The bottom line is this: you should pick the framework that best fits your team, your app, and your plans – not just the one with the loudest hype.

Top cross-platform mobile app development frameworks: FAQs

In most cases, very close – especially with frameworks like Flutter and React Native.

Flutter compiles to native ARM code and renders UI using its own Skia engine, which means performance is highly predictable and consistent across platforms.

This makes it a strong choice for apps that need pixel-perfect UI or handle frequent UI redraws, like dashboards or animations.

React Native relies on a bridge between JavaScript and native modules.

While this can introduce slight overhead in apps with a high volume of async operations or frequent UI updates, in real-world business apps (think forms, API-driven UIs, CRUD-heavy workflows), performance is nearly indistinguishable from native.

That said, for performance-critical use cases – like 60 FPS animations, real-time media processing, or complex 3D rendering – true native (Swift/Kotlin) or game engines (e.g., Unity) are still the better fit.

It depends on your priorities and setup.

Flutter is often faster at runtime thanks to ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation and its fully custom rendering engine. It also avoids reliance on OEM components, which gives you more UI consistency across platforms. But it comes with trade-offs:

  • You’ll need to learn and adopt Dart, which has a smaller hiring pool and ecosystem compared to JavaScript.
  • Flutter apps can be larger in binary size due to bundled rendering logic.
  • Native platform integrations (especially for iOS) sometimes require custom platform channels, which adds complexity.

React Native, on the other hand, is built around JavaScript, uses native components, and has a massive community and plugin ecosystem.

It’s more mature in terms of third-party integrations, particularly with platform SDKs. However, it suffers from performance bottlenecks if you’re pushing the bridge too hard with complex interactions or animations.

In short, choose Flutter for full control over UI, better runtime performance, and a modern toolchain. And choose React Native if you’re invested in JavaScript, want a lower barrier to entry, and care more about development speed than full UI customization.

React Native is the most natural fit. You can build native mobile apps using the same language, libraries, and tooling you’re already using for web – plus a massive ecosystem of packages.

If you’re working in a TypeScript-first environment, this also translates well to React Native and NativeScript.

NativeScript allows you to access native iOS and Android APIs directly from JavaScript or TypeScript without going through a bridge. It’s great for teams that need fine-grained control over native features, but it comes with a steeper learning curve and a smaller community.

Ionic is also worth mentioning – especially if you’re building apps that are more UI/content-focused than performance-critical.

It uses standard web technologies and can share code across web, iOS, and Android, but may struggle with high-performance requirements.

Need a cross-platform app?

Do you have a great idea for an app but want to make it fast, and cost-effective?

Don’t worry, we can help you make it a reality.

We’ll handle your app’s development from start to finish, from validating your idea to post-launch maintenance and updates.

If you want to learn more, check out our approach to mobile app development and feel free to get in touch with us.

And if you’re an engineer just browsing for insights and best practices – we’ve got you covered, too.

Check out our engineering hub for deep dives, practical guides, and real-world lessons we’ve learned during our 13+ years in business.

Categories
Written by

Vladimir Kolbas

Software Engineering Team Lead

When something unusual happens, Vlado is the man with an explanation. An experienced iOS Team Lead with a PhD in Astrophysics, he has a staggering knowledge of IT. Vlado has a lot of responsibilities, but still has time to help everybody on the team, no matter how big or small the need. His passions include coffee brewing, lengthy sci-fi novels and all things Apple. On nice days, you might find Vlado on a trail run. On rainier days, you’ll probably find him making unique furniture in the garage.

Related articles